In the Detroit News Bob Wojnowski had an article yesterday about Big Ten realignment following the addition of Maryland and Rutgers. As the conference has said geography will play a major factor in determining the alignment, here are Wojo's proposed divisions:
East: Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue, Rutgers, Maryland
West: Michigan State, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Northwestern
If you're feeling a little fuzzy on the geography, yes, both Indiana schools are to the west of MSU. Not that it necessarily matters, but it's probably worth noting. Here are the current divisions if, like me, you can't keep them straight:
Legends: Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State
Leaders: Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Purdue, Wisconsin, Illinois
A few thoughts:
-Is there a legitimate need to have UM and OSU separated?
-Will teams in the hypothetical East have a recruiting advantage due to increased exposure?
-How much do you worry about competitive balance, if at all?
-Will they keep the names Legends and Leaders?
-Will there be 16 teams by the time the moves are made?
1 comment:
No, probably not a need. I could see a recruiting advantage in the Ast in that scenario.
Scrap the Legends and Leaders.
I think there will be 16 teams. The Big Ten is practically a whole new conference, why bother with history at this point? Get your 16th and quit.
I worry about balance. Case in point the SEC. It seems like one division is clearly stacked and the SEC Championship is just a formality.
Post a Comment